Deployment in Africa
Should we imitate the American model ?

Development & Model 

Should we imitate the American model?
By Sams Dine SY, Financial Economist, Consultant, Dakar
(published in 2003 Sud Quotidien, Le Matin)
Within a week, Senegal's President Abdoulaye Wade clearly affirmed his admiration for the American model. A national daily newspaper (Le Soleil of August 30 and September 1) and an African weekly (Jeune Afrique of August-6 September) reported it in turn, and in the first, he pronounced the sentence in unequivocal terms: "Europe cannot be a model for us, because Europe was built in two thousand years. The United States has, because its development has taken place, I would say almost before our eyes... in one hundred and fifty years...", thus becoming"... the greatest political and economic force in the world, on what would be at most one fifth of Africa".
Curiously his statement went almost unnoticed. Political current events, which are quite rich, undoubtedly have something to do with it. However, the implications of this choice, given Senegal's intellectual influence in Africa, do not suffer from comparison with those of the media-political adventures of recent weeks. If only for that reason, there is reason to take a closer look. Four questions come to mind: what is at the origin of development, as we measure it today? Is the time taken by America and Europe to develop correct? Is the speed of development a relevant criterion to qualify one as a model and the other as a push-back? To what extent can the development process be imitated?
The thesis of the development of Europe completed in 2000 years stems from works among which we can quote those of Paul Bairoch.  It was defeated by Angus Maddison who, following a thorough investigation, managed to reconstruct the global development scenario during the last millennium. The significant fact according to him, is that the gap between the level of development of the populations of the different regions of the inhabited world was reasonable until about 1820 and not a century earlier. These populations would have lived on, roughly, the equivalent of less than US$2 a day. Including, in Africa, despite the long period of slavery and the regular drain on its resources in previous centuries. The gaps with the rest of the world began to widen from 1820, to become abyssal for only half a century, especially between Africa and the United States.
Yet, as early as the 15th century, Europe had launched a vast undertaking to unify the world through trade and technical progress. The European model had thus gradually spread throughout the world, with varying fortunes. But Europe would not have begun to reap the benefits of development until the 18th century, only a few decades before the United States. This country has finally taken its world leadership, no doubt helped by the vitality of its active population, its capacity to innovate, but also by the interminable wars on the old continent.
From this brief overview, it should be noted that development, as we measure it today, is a recent affair. Europe and America have developed over a short period not exceeding one hundred and eighty years. The development process also appears to be a well-kept secret. To the first group of 24 countries that crossed the $1,200 GDP/hr barrier in 1900, only a handful of 6 countries could be added in 2000 whose GDP/hr exceeded the $14,000 barrier, while the former USSR lagged behind.
President Wade may have decided a little quickly, but he has the merit of relaunching the debate on the American and European models, a debate that has been raging since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Thus, productive systems, innovation systems, modes of governance, managerial cultures and conflict resolution modes, including value conflicts, were compared. The differences - between the (European) Rhine model, which is network oriented, and the American model, which is market oriented - are exacerbated before being put into perspective. Following the tragic events of 11 November and the change of strategic paradigm with the notion of preventive war, "old Europe" and "new America" could be presented, one as a repeller and the other as a model. It is undoubtedly in this current that President Wade joins. However, the analysis of these two regions shows an extraordinary level of strategic interdependence due to the intensity of economic, trade and technological relations. Moreover, there is no evidence that Europe's decline and American supremacy are irreversible processes.
To the extent that there is neither opposition between these two models, nor a codified and generalizable development process, the apprentice

  1. Summary
  2. Policy Analysis : Deployment in Africa
  3. Covid Analytics for Dummies
  4. Stop Policy Analysis bashing !
  5. Sustainable Financing for Capacity Development in Africa
  6. New Modes of Governance in Africa.;2006
  7. Universities: Towards the African University of the 3rd Millennium: Master Plan
  8. Phd & Master Economics: Capacity of African Faculties of Economics and Management
  9. Central Banking & Economic Policy Analysis
  10. Master in Finance & Business CESAG: Capacity for Higher Education in Banking and Financial Markets
  11. Methodology : Preparing and Designing a National Capacity Development Plan: The Case of CAR
  12. Partnership : Nepad critical assessment
  13. Integration : RENFOR ECCAS Capacity
  14. Entreprise Capacity Develpment Project: Impact of Private Sector Business Foundation Support, 1995
  15. Public Spending Review : the case of social sector Senegal, 1998
  16. The Federalist: Africa and the Federal State
  17. Millenium Summit & African leaders : a discursive policy analysis
  18. Performance : Sen-Stigltz Report : a comment
  19. Franc CFA in search of Capacitary Transformation
  20. Cluster competitivness & National Innovation System
  21. Euro Dollar & Challenges for West Africa
  22. Mdgs
  23. Another Century for Develpment
  24. Globalisation & Development
  25. Critical Social Thinking: Blends in honor of Samir Amin
  26. The Thinker and the Expert, 2003
  27. Samir Amin : Nobel Prize in Economics ?
  28. Ethics & Policy
  29. Futur of Socialism
  30. Transformation of the CFA Franc Zone, 1997
  31. Should we imitate the american model ?
  32. Globalization: Landmarks and Evolution, Characteristics and Stakes
  33. Financial Policy for Growth: Senegal; 1997
  34. Production and Industrial Management in Africa: 1996
  35. Regional Dynamics & Innovation System
  36. Action Plan for Financing Agricultural Research; 1995
  37. Core Capacities UNECA; 1994
  38. From Development Planning to Policy Analysis
  39. Policy Analysis Template, 1992
  40. Planning in Africa: Key Issues for the Future 1992
  41. Idep Short Term Training: 1992 in Policy Analysis Idep: 1992
  42. Preparatory phase; Idep; 1991
  43. Idep : Review of the Training Program 1964-1991
  44. UNDP Rôle And Mandate, 1991
  45. Senegalese experience in U.N. projects execution, 1991
  46. Master in Finance & Business: African Management Training Network